Comments on: Debate Tomorrow http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/ news and views from uc berkeley Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:53:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: Anonymous http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1985 Anonymous Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:35:54 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1985 <blockquote cite="">Shut up, Jon. You shouldn’t have ever gotten a PhD from Cal.</blockquote> Yo Fresh! I think I caught Jazzy Jeff knockin' boots with Jada. Psych!

Shut up, Jon. You shouldn’t have ever gotten a PhD from Cal.

Yo Fresh! I think I caught Jazzy Jeff knockin’ boots with Jada. Psych!

]]> By: Fresh Prince http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1976 Fresh Prince Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:34:23 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1976 Shut up, Jon. You shouldn't have ever gotten a PhD from Cal. Shut up, Jon. You shouldn’t have ever gotten a PhD from Cal.

]]> By: HB http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1973 HB Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:05:08 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1973 pwned! pwned!

]]> By: jonp http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1972 jonp Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:07:46 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1972 *** support da military and fuk dose socialist clowns *** fuk a smashT pencildik chickenhawk who don't enlist in da war da clown Xpects everybody else to fight Xcept him bitchslappT ***
support da military and fuk dose socialist clowns
***

fuk a smashT pencildik chickenhawk who don’t enlist in da war da clown Xpects everybody else to fight Xcept him

bitchslappT

]]> By: Dick N. Cider http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1970 Dick N. Cider Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:03:49 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1970 Or we could just have a protest to kick them off campus just like the protest they had last semester about kicking military recruiters off. Or we could just have a protest to kick them off campus just like the protest they had last semester about kicking military recruiters off.

]]> By: smashT http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1967 smashT Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:45:25 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1967 lol we should have a debate about kicking da stop da war coalition off campus ;-). support da military and fuk dose socialist clowns "smashT" lol we should have a debate about kicking da stop da war coalition off campus ;-).

support da military and fuk dose socialist clowns

“smashT”

]]> By: Ehud http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1962 Ehud Sat, 17 Sep 2005 03:00:31 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2005/09/14/debate-tomorrow/#comment-1962 Veronica, DADT is not some tangental issue. It is central to the question of military recruitment, particularly in light of Fair vs. Rumsfeld which BCR never seemed to address. And while BCR, when it suited them, said "Iraq has nothing to do with recruitment" (i.e. "You're making our rosy portrait of the war look bad, so we'll split hairs"), it was they whose opening statement was along the lines of: "We must remember: We are in a WAR." If they talk about the war, we talk about the war. But if they suddenly want to stop talking about the war, let's talk about DADT. And be prepared to take a position. This is not some obscure controversy. Additionally, BCR knew that recruitment would be the subject of debate since May. "Admitting they did not personally know something," was a cop-out for someone who would have looked hypocritical had he supported the policy and who would have alienated the macho war cheerleaders he was representing had he actually come out against it. Veronica, DADT is not some tangental issue. It is central to the question of military recruitment, particularly in light of Fair vs. Rumsfeld which BCR never seemed to address. And while BCR, when it suited them, said “Iraq has nothing to do with recruitment” (i.e. “You’re making our rosy portrait of the war look bad, so we’ll split hairs”), it was they whose opening statement was along the lines of: “We must remember: We are in a WAR.” If they talk about the war, we talk about the war. But if they suddenly want to stop talking about the war, let’s talk about DADT. And be prepared to take a position. This is not some obscure controversy. Additionally, BCR knew that recruitment would be the subject of debate since May. “Admitting they did not personally know something,” was a cop-out for someone who would have looked hypocritical had he supported the policy and who would have alienated the macho war cheerleaders he was representing had he actually come out against it.

]]>