Comments on: BCR v. Cal Dems on CNBC http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/ news and views from uc berkeley Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:26:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: Ham Sandwich http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18668 Ham Sandwich Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:03:14 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18668 Hey Pat, might want to let my previous comment through the spam filter. :) Hey Pat, might want to let my previous comment through the spam filter. :)

]]> By: Ham Sandwich http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18667 Ham Sandwich Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:02:30 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18667 "Kudlow: “Uhhhh, It is like you are comparing academia to refer to an academic approach?, or Arithmetic refers to a numeric approach?, Suzanne, can you answer for Salad Tosser, he doesn’t know what a supply-sider is?”" Actually, no. In this example, arithmetic would be "the economy". There are arithmetic approaches, just as there are economic approaches. No sense in trying to confuse people with your extremely weak anologies, Anonymous. Though they may be some picture as your capabilities. Allow me to present Exhibit B: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/tyrrell.supplyside/index.html" rel="nofollow">Supply side?</a> <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2136886?nav=wp" rel="nofollow">But...but...</a> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/blogs/curiouscapitalist/index.html#116187092106695424" rel="nofollow">I though no one used it anymore?</a> <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlow/kudlow200502091401.asp" rel="nofollow">How can this be?</a> <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0514-20.htm" rel="nofollow">Maybe Google is just too advanced for some people...</a> “Kudlow: “Uhhhh, It is like you are comparing academia to refer to an academic approach?, or Arithmetic refers to a numeric approach?, Suzanne, can you answer for Salad Tosser, he doesn’t know what a supply-sider is?””

Actually, no. In this example, arithmetic would be “the economy”. There are arithmetic approaches, just as there are economic approaches. No sense in trying to confuse people with your extremely weak anologies, Anonymous. Though they may be some picture as your capabilities.

Allow me to present Exhibit B:
Supply side?
But…but…
I though no one used it anymore?
How can this be?
Maybe Google is just too advanced for some people…

]]> By: ghost of Clark Kerr http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18666 ghost of Clark Kerr Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:34:05 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18666 I doubt too many people will see your damage control. Are you trying to be funny, Anonymous? I doubt too many people will see your damage control. Are you trying to be funny, Anonymous?

]]> By: patr http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18647 patr Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:11:20 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18647 Anonymous, sorry about your comments being caught in the spam filter. It seems to be harsher when it comes to anonymous commenters. Use a pseudonym and it will probably be more likely to let your comments through immediately. Anonymous, sorry about your comments being caught in the spam filter. It seems to be harsher when it comes to anonymous commenters. Use a pseudonym and it will probably be more likely to let your comments through immediately.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18642 Anonymous Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:21:14 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18642 <b>Kudlow</b>: “Salad tosser, are you a supply-sider?” <b>Salad tosser</b>: "Supply side economics refers to an economic approach." <b>Kudlow</b>: “and?, what is your point Tosser? Do you know what it is or don’t you?” <b>Salad tosser</b>: “The label is widely used to describe that particular economic approach.” <b>Kudlow</b>: "Uhhhh, It is like you are comparing academia to refer to an academic approach?, or Arithmetic refers to a numeric approach?, Suzanne, can you answer for Salad Tosser, he doesn’t know what a supply-sider is?” <b>Suzanne</b>: “Sure no problem. It is a program of lowering taxes to stimulate manufacturing jobs therefore creating more employment in which a wider tax bases is created in which all stimulates the economy and creates jobs and a vibrant tax-base. You know like China is doing right now with manufacturing everything the Americans use in the domestic sphere. We buy-it they supply-it. We pay and they get rich. Look at the monthly trade imbalances. We're losing. However, there is less then 9% manufacturing in America so this program is obsolete. So if Tosser knew what SSE was he would have told you this strait-off. Therefore it is useless to consider this a contemporary relevance. We have many service sector jobs in which to address to our tax issues. No one uses this label anymore. Tosser is wrong as usual. I did a news ‘ yahoo search’ and found ZERO results - news/web pages, including archives, that deal with this label; only a reference to the guy who created the hypothesis who was giving a speech of why this is irrelevant to the American economy now. You can do a history and find a lot of pages on SSE, but that is archived history on the internet, not current news.” <b>Kudlow</b>: So you are saying, even though Salad Tosser believes that it is ‘widely used’ it is in fact not, I’m just pinning for the good-old-days, and he is wrong, and people are wondering why he claiming such a thing?” <b>Suzanne</b>: “ well I have no understanding of where he is coming from and how he thinks this label is widely used." <b>Kudlow</b>: “ Nice ending and analysis Suzanne, and folks will leave it at that.” Kudlow: “Salad tosser, are you a supply-sider?”
Salad tosser: “Supply side economics refers to an economic approach.”
Kudlow: “and?, what is your point Tosser? Do you know what it is or don’t you?”
Salad tosser: “The label is widely used to describe that particular economic approach.”
Kudlow: “Uhhhh, It is like you are comparing academia to refer to an academic approach?, or Arithmetic refers to a numeric approach?, Suzanne, can you answer for Salad Tosser, he doesn’t know what a supply-sider is?”
Suzanne: “Sure no problem. It is a program of lowering taxes to stimulate manufacturing jobs therefore creating more employment in which a wider tax bases is created in which all stimulates the economy and creates jobs and a vibrant tax-base. You know like China is doing right now with manufacturing everything the Americans use in the domestic sphere. We buy-it they supply-it. We pay and they get rich. Look at the monthly trade imbalances. We’re losing. However, there is less then 9% manufacturing in America so this program is obsolete. So if Tosser knew what SSE was he would have told you this strait-off. Therefore it is useless to consider this a contemporary relevance. We have many service sector jobs in which to address to our tax issues. No one uses this label anymore. Tosser is wrong as usual. I did a news ‘ yahoo search’ and found ZERO results - news/web pages, including archives, that deal with this label; only a reference to the guy who created the hypothesis who was giving a speech of why this is irrelevant to the American economy now. You can do a history and find a lot of pages on SSE, but that is archived history on the internet, not current news.”
Kudlow: So you are saying, even though Salad Tosser believes that it is ‘widely used’ it is in fact not, I’m just pinning for the good-old-days, and he is wrong, and people are wondering why he claiming such a thing?”
Suzanne: “ well I have no understanding of where he is coming from and how he thinks this label is widely used.”
Kudlow: “ Nice ending and analysis Suzanne, and folks will leave it at that.”

]]> By: Nathan http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18640 Nathan Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:33:42 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18640 That was weak stuff- well at least Berkeley is in the news for something positive. Maybe it'll draw more top-notch conservatives to generate a more diverse and education discussion in class rooms. One can only hope. That was weak stuff- well at least Berkeley is in the news for something positive.

Maybe it’ll draw more top-notch conservatives to generate a more diverse and education discussion in class rooms.

One can only hope.

]]> By: Salad Tosser http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18638 Salad Tosser Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:15:46 +0000 http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2006/10/26/bcr-v-cal-dems-on-cnbc/#comment-18638 Supply side economics refers to an economic approach. The label is widely used to describe that particular economic approach. Whether or not certain leaders have used that approach is irrelevant because Kudlow didn't ask whether or not Josiah supported a specific leader's approach; he asked whether Josiah supported that particular economic approach. Kudlow: "Josiah, are you a supply-sider?" Josiah: "No, I'm really not." Check out the response Suzanne gave at that point. I think just about everyone, except Josiah, knew what was asked. Especially with the question that was posed to the Suzanne right before. Also check out Josiah's reaction when he realizes what supply side economics are. SHOCK! Whoops! His response wasn't one in which he expresses a wish to clarify his initial answer. The answer speaks for itself. Supply side economics refers to an economic approach. The label is widely used to describe that particular economic approach. Whether or not certain leaders have used that approach is irrelevant because Kudlow didn’t ask whether or not Josiah supported a specific leader’s approach; he asked whether Josiah supported that particular economic approach.

Kudlow: “Josiah, are you a supply-sider?”
Josiah: “No, I’m really not.”

Check out the response Suzanne gave at that point. I think just about everyone, except Josiah, knew what was asked. Especially with the question that was posed to the Suzanne right before.

Also check out Josiah’s reaction when he realizes what supply side economics are. SHOCK! Whoops! His response wasn’t one in which he expresses a wish to clarify his initial answer.

The answer speaks for itself.

]]>