<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second GOP primary debate</title>
	<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/</link>
	<description>news and views from uc berkeley</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ghost of Clark Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21503</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost of Clark Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 04:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21503</guid>
		<description>WTF are you talking about Beetle? Trying to be one a smart ass again? That's the fucking problem with you. You're always stuck in that mode.

The presidential directive (not a 'statement') actually outlines a course of action and is very important from a bureaucratic standpoint. 

But who cares what the effects are, as long as the "liberals" are angry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF are you talking about Beetle? Trying to be one a smart ass again? That&#8217;s the fucking problem with you. You&#8217;re always stuck in that mode.</p>
<p>The presidential directive (not a &#8217;statement&#8217;) actually outlines a course of action and is very important from a bureaucratic standpoint. </p>
<p>But who cares what the effects are, as long as the &#8220;liberals&#8221; are angry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beetle</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21484</link>
		<dc:creator>Beetle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 07:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21484</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure what you think signing a statement that says "I can seize dictatorial power at any time" means. If he has the power to do that, he'd have that power whether or not he signed such a statement. If he doesn't, signing such a statement isn't going to accomplish much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you think signing a statement that says &#8220;I can seize dictatorial power at any time&#8221; means. If he has the power to do that, he&#8217;d have that power whether or not he signed such a statement. If he doesn&#8217;t, signing such a statement isn&#8217;t going to accomplish much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost of Clark Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21483</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost of Clark Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 06:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21483</guid>
		<description>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55824


Still in denial, Andrew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55824" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55824</a></p>
<p>Still in denial, Andrew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Quinio</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21423</link>
		<dc:creator>B Quinio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21423</guid>
		<description>I don't really get the diehard love you Berkeley Republicans have for President Bush. The guy has eroded personal freedoms and increased the size of the government, all in the name of "security" -- an issue for which Bush has no credibility. Consider his weak border control and proposal for amnesty (padoning of a federal crime), to his widely ignorant position that terrorists attack us because they hate our freedoms (a statement contradicted by our CIA officials and the 9/11 Commission Report). The guy is dangerous for our safety and, in reality, a fan of big centralized government.

You Berkeley Republicans are the personification of unprincipled drones. My only hope is that Bush somehow convinces you to enlist and fight in Iraq. If we're going to sacrifice anyone, it should be people without brains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really get the diehard love you Berkeley Republicans have for President Bush. The guy has eroded personal freedoms and increased the size of the government, all in the name of &#8220;security&#8221; &#8212; an issue for which Bush has no credibility. Consider his weak border control and proposal for amnesty (padoning of a federal crime), to his widely ignorant position that terrorists attack us because they hate our freedoms (a statement contradicted by our CIA officials and the 9/11 Commission Report). The guy is dangerous for our safety and, in reality, a fan of big centralized government.</p>
<p>You Berkeley Republicans are the personification of unprincipled drones. My only hope is that Bush somehow convinces you to enlist and fight in Iraq. If we&#8217;re going to sacrifice anyone, it should be people without brains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Quinio</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21394</link>
		<dc:creator>A Quinio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 01:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21394</guid>
		<description>*Rumsfeld</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Rumsfeld</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Quinio</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21393</link>
		<dc:creator>A Quinio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 01:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21393</guid>
		<description>They still probably wouldn't compare Bush to Marcos and then point out Hamdi v. Rumsfield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They still probably wouldn&#8217;t compare Bush to Marcos and then point out Hamdi v. Rumsfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost of Clark Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21388</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost of Clark Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 23:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2007/05/15/second-gop-primary-debate/#comment-21388</guid>
		<description>Is it really? Any person who suffered under the Marcos regime probably wished that he (an constitutionally elected leader) did not have the unchecked power to declare martial law. In analyzing our situation and Military Commissions Act of 2006, what would they say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really? Any person who suffered under the Marcos regime probably wished that he (an constitutionally elected leader) did not have the unchecked power to declare martial law. In analyzing our situation and Military Commissions Act of 2006, what would they say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
