<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for california patriot blog</title>
	<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog</link>
	<description>news and views from uc berkeley</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Change We Can Believe In? by Argh!</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25384</link>
		<dc:creator>Argh!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25384</guid>
		<description>Um, where are the bloggers? There's the tree-sitters, Obama's trip, VP choices, the CA budget, blah blah. Anybody out there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, where are the bloggers? There&#8217;s the tree-sitters, Obama&#8217;s trip, VP choices, the CA budget, blah blah. Anybody out there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Change We Can Believe In? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25381</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25381</guid>
		<description>Defenestrate?

wow, I thought I was the only one to ever use that word in a sentence. No matter your politics, Messiah, you're on a cool-list some where for using that word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defenestrate?</p>
<p>wow, I thought I was the only one to ever use that word in a sentence. No matter your politics, Messiah, you&#8217;re on a cool-list some where for using that word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alternate View on Gay Marriage by Leave me alone.</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/05/31/alternate-view-on-gay-marriage/#comment-25380</link>
		<dc:creator>Leave me alone.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/05/31/alternate-view-on-gay-marriage/#comment-25380</guid>
		<description>I don't need the government to difine for me that which is already in the dictionary. In my sense of the word: marriage is a union by God of a man and a woman. Instead of replacing the word marriage on my tax papers with "domestic partner," as the writer proposes, I'd rather see the IRS burned and outlawed, never to return.

Everyone has the priviledge to obtain government marriage. We've jsut defined it as a man and a woman. It's a special permit the gov. gives out, so it can give it to whomever We the People allow.

Instead of subjecting more people to government tyranny, i'd rather see the whole thing disappear as a State function. When did we become such slaves to the government that we needed them to tell us this sort of thing, anyway?

I don't celebrate equality; I celebrate Liberty.

Never give the government more power. They have enough of it already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t need the government to difine for me that which is already in the dictionary. In my sense of the word: marriage is a union by God of a man and a woman. Instead of replacing the word marriage on my tax papers with &#8220;domestic partner,&#8221; as the writer proposes, I&#8217;d rather see the IRS burned and outlawed, never to return.</p>
<p>Everyone has the priviledge to obtain government marriage. We&#8217;ve jsut defined it as a man and a woman. It&#8217;s a special permit the gov. gives out, so it can give it to whomever We the People allow.</p>
<p>Instead of subjecting more people to government tyranny, i&#8217;d rather see the whole thing disappear as a State function. When did we become such slaves to the government that we needed them to tell us this sort of thing, anyway?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t celebrate equality; I celebrate Liberty.</p>
<p>Never give the government more power. They have enough of it already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Change We Can Believe In? by Tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25379</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25379</guid>
		<description>Care to say anything more substantial about the matter? I stand behind what I said; Reagan was an excellent president and a phenomenal communicator. But he wasn't perfect. How about you explain yourself and build some credibility so you don't rely on name-calling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Care to say anything more substantial about the matter? I stand behind what I said; Reagan was an excellent president and a phenomenal communicator. But he wasn&#8217;t perfect. How about you explain yourself and build some credibility so you don&#8217;t rely on name-calling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Change We Can Believe In? by Messiah</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25378</link>
		<dc:creator>Messiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25378</guid>
		<description>Tommy, you're such an idiot. 

"Reagan: Conservatives never fawned upon him like the Left does over Obama. Ever. He was criticized for Lebanon, arms reductions, fiscal spending, and a host of other issues."

Way to defenestrate your credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy, you&#8217;re such an idiot. </p>
<p>&#8220;Reagan: Conservatives never fawned upon him like the Left does over Obama. Ever. He was criticized for Lebanon, arms reductions, fiscal spending, and a host of other issues.&#8221;</p>
<p>Way to defenestrate your credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Change We Can Believe In? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25377</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25377</guid>
		<description>yuri,

Obama is confused and stuck between the voting block of ' foreigners' and the 'Establishment' whites. That is why he flippedy-floppites almost constantly. In part, McCain is under this spell too. Clinton also had this disease. Reagan cared less --  that is why he was consistent. La Raza is for Laraza and whomever panders gets their approval -- they care less about whitey America and its traditions. So goes for all the other races. There is no 'inclusionist' society in history that has worked before,  so this is par the course. When Obama or McCain are around crowds of Hispanics they support Hispanic causes. Are you in the first grade or something? Everyone knows this. So why debate the issues, they mean nothing. It is all about race. Political correctness is long gone, its now called political pandering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yuri,</p>
<p>Obama is confused and stuck between the voting block of &#8216; foreigners&#8217; and the &#8216;Establishment&#8217; whites. That is why he flippedy-floppites almost constantly. In part, McCain is under this spell too. Clinton also had this disease. Reagan cared less &#8212;  that is why he was consistent. La Raza is for Laraza and whomever panders gets their approval &#8212; they care less about whitey America and its traditions. So goes for all the other races. There is no &#8216;inclusionist&#8217; society in history that has worked before,  so this is par the course. When Obama or McCain are around crowds of Hispanics they support Hispanic causes. Are you in the first grade or something? Everyone knows this. So why debate the issues, they mean nothing. It is all about race. Political correctness is long gone, its now called political pandering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Change We Can Believe In? by Tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25376</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/2008/07/06/change-we-can-believe-in/#comment-25376</guid>
		<description>Personally I don't believe in applying the Army Field Manual to the CIA or to the domestic security services of our allies. That McCain has changed his position here is debatable; I think the real question is whether or not he defines waterboarding as torture. Many libertarians and liberals will repeat the mantra that terrorists captured in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve the same constitutional protections as those afforded to common criminals here at home. With all due respect, I strongly disagree. I sleep better at night knowing people like Kalid Sheikh Muhammad are subjected to noise, sleep deprivation, and waterboarding to protect the American people at home and her men and women at arms abroad.

Republicans supporting McCain not having "any principles”: I’ve never heard anything more ridiculous on this Blog (that’s saying something!) We believe in 1) National security 2) Economic renewal 3) Originalist judges 4) Free trade 5) Energy independence and 6) Patriotism and national service. You are confusing yourself with the Obama people, whose sole desire in November is to see their Messiah ascend to the White House to right all wrongs as He sees fit. 

Reagan: Conservatives never fawned upon him like the Left does over Obama. Ever. He was criticized for Lebanon, arms reductions, fiscal spending, and a host of other issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I don&#8217;t believe in applying the Army Field Manual to the CIA or to the domestic security services of our allies. That McCain has changed his position here is debatable; I think the real question is whether or not he defines waterboarding as torture. Many libertarians and liberals will repeat the mantra that terrorists captured in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve the same constitutional protections as those afforded to common criminals here at home. With all due respect, I strongly disagree. I sleep better at night knowing people like Kalid Sheikh Muhammad are subjected to noise, sleep deprivation, and waterboarding to protect the American people at home and her men and women at arms abroad.</p>
<p>Republicans supporting McCain not having &#8220;any principles”: I’ve never heard anything more ridiculous on this Blog (that’s saying something!) We believe in 1) National security 2) Economic renewal 3) Originalist judges 4) Free trade 5) Energy independence and 6) Patriotism and national service. You are confusing yourself with the Obama people, whose sole desire in November is to see their Messiah ascend to the White House to right all wrongs as He sees fit. </p>
<p>Reagan: Conservatives never fawned upon him like the Left does over Obama. Ever. He was criticized for Lebanon, arms reductions, fiscal spending, and a host of other issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
